The EOS RP has a shutter speed range of 30-1,4000sec plus B, while the EOS R offers 30-1/8000sec plus B. Winner: Canon EOS RP by a small margin, possibly, but neither has IBIS 5. ![]() The EOS RP does offer Digital IS for movies, which is not mentioned in the EOS R’s specifications, though the EOS R is better adapted to professional video use as we’ll see shortly. Neither camera has in-body image stabilisation (unlike Canon's newer models) so both rely on lens-based image stabilization. Neither camera supports the latest CFexpress card format, so in that respect, both are starting to look a little dated. The EOS R has come in for some criticism for having just a single SD/SDHC/SDXC memory card slot, but it is UHS II compatible, so while it doesn’t take the new super-fast XQD/CFexpress cards been introduced by other brands, it should still be quite fast enough – and the EOS RP shares the same UHS II compatibility. We’re quite pleased that Canon has not reduced the maximum ISO of the EOS RP to keep it below the EOS R.Įven the storage systems are identical. With the same processor and similar resolution, it’s perhaps no surprise that the EOS RP and the EOS R offer the standard ISO range of 100-40,000, expandable to ISO 50-102,400. ![]() The EOS RP and the EOS R both have Canon’s DIGIC 8 image processor and, interestingly, they both have the company’s DLO (Digital Lens Optimizer) feature for enhancing fine detail in images shot with Canon lenses. It’s not just the sensor that affects a camera’s performance but its image processor too, and here the playing field is dead level. Winner: Canon EOS R thanks to its small resolution advantage 2.The EOS R brings other enhancements and features too, but if outright resolution is all you’re interested in, the EOS R’s advantage is fairly marginal. It’s a small difference that’s not terribly significant on its own. Find out how we test.īoth cameras have full-frame CMOS sensors, but the EOS R has slightly higher resolution at 30.3 million pixels versus 26.2 million pixels in the EOS RP. Why you can trust Digital Camera World Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. So we’ve broken down all the key specifications and differences to examine them one by one to help you decide which is best for you the deliberately cheap Canon EOS RP or the newly-cheap Canon EOS R. It's also not a whole lot more expensive than the cheapskate (sorry, Canon) EOS RP. And at today's prices, the EOS R, even without in-body stabilization, looks rather good. But the camera market being what it is, the prices dropped, and dropped, and dropped. It's a rather good camera with plenty of qualities and plenty of life left in it. That left the original EOS R looking a bit sick and old. Both were more advanced than the dear old EOS R, both had full-width 4K (the EOS R5, of course, has 8K too), and both had in-body stabilization. For a long time that was the status quo.īut then the EOS R5 and EOS R6 happened. The EOS RP was a much cheaper entry point into Canon’s new EOS R system, and suddenly you had to figure out whether the more advanced specs and build of the EOS R were really worth the money. ![]() When Canon introduced the EOS RP it also introduced a lot of questions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |